PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWLTX vs. VMATX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWLTX vs. VMATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWLTX) and Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund (VMATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWLTX achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly higher than VMATX's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VWLTX has outperformed VMATX with an annualized return of 2.62%, while VMATX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


VWLTX

1D
0.28%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.35%
1Y
8.40%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
2.62%

VMATX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.24%
1Y
8.65%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWLTX vs. VMATX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWLTX
Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
1.94%4.80%2.44%7.56%-10.43%1.83%6.21%8.77%0.89%6.45%
VMATX
Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
1.83%4.96%2.53%7.19%-10.79%1.65%6.47%8.93%0.47%6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VWLTX and VMATX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 1998

0.92

The correlation between VWLTX and VMATX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWLTX vs. VMATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWLTX
VWLTX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VWLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VMATX
VMATX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VMATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMATX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VMATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMATX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWLTX vs. VMATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWLTX) and Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund (VMATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWLTXVMATXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

2.70

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.35

4.20

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.66

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.60

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.64

9.23

+0.41

VWLTX vs. VMATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWLTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the VMATX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWLTX and VMATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWLTXVMATXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.70

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.24

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.00

-0.47

Drawdowns

VWLTX vs. VMATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWLTX drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than VMATX's maximum drawdown of -15.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWLTX and VMATX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWLTXVMATXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-15.91%

-34.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-3.30%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.92%

-6.68%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

-15.91%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.01%

-15.91%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.44%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.18%

-2.10%

-8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.93%

-0.07%

Volatility

VWLTX vs. VMATX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWLTX) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund (VMATX) at 1.19%. This indicates that VWLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWLTXVMATXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.19%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

2.42%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

3.20%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.60%

4.66%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.51%

4.65%

-0.14%

VWLTX vs. VMATX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWLTX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VMATX's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWLTX vs. VMATX - Dividend Comparison

VWLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than VMATX's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMATX
Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
3.61%4.46%3.98%3.06%2.69%2.26%3.22%3.63%3.07%2.91%3.55%3.22%
VWLTX
Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
3.69%4.51%3.98%3.09%2.91%2.65%3.24%3.82%3.49%3.70%3.98%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VWLTX and VMATX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VWLTX has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to VMATX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWLTX dropped -49.97% vs VMATX's -15.91%.

VWLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWLTX and VMATX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer