PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWZ vs. SWNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWZ vs. SWNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and Schwab Tax-Free Bond Fund™ (SWNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWZ achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than SWNTX's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PWZ has outperformed SWNTX with an annualized return of 1.79%, while SWNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


PWZ

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.02%
YTD
2.63%
6M
2.63%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
1.79%

SWNTX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.39%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.72%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
3.30%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWZ vs. SWNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
2.63%1.26%2.16%6.55%-11.35%1.94%4.90%8.72%0.32%6.82%
SWNTX
Schwab Tax-Free Bond Fund™
1.33%4.20%1.57%5.09%-8.57%0.37%4.45%6.55%0.88%4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PWZ and SWNTX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2007

0.50

The correlation between PWZ and SWNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWZ vs. SWNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWZ
PWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SWNTX
SWNTX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SWNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SWNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWZ vs. SWNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and Schwab Tax-Free Bond Fund™ (SWNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWZSWNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.67

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.19

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

7.13

+1.57

PWZ vs. SWNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the SWNTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWZ and SWNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWZ vs. SWNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWZ drawdown since its inception was -21.49%, which is greater than SWNTX's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWZ and SWNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWZSWNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.49%

-13.26%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.47%

-2.88%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.09%

-4.85%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.56%

-13.26%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.56%

-13.26%

-4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.79%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-1.89%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.88%

+0.08%

Volatility

PWZ vs. SWNTX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Schwab Tax-Free Bond Fund™ (SWNTX) at 0.76%. This indicates that PWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWZSWNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

0.76%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

1.86%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

2.42%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

3.49%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.89%

3.57%

+2.32%

PWZ vs. SWNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWZ has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than SWNTX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWZ vs. SWNTX - Dividend Comparison

PWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than SWNTX's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.61%3.41%3.28%2.84%2.49%2.28%2.34%2.51%2.53%2.48%2.86%3.16%
SWNTX
Schwab Tax-Free Bond Fund™
3.46%3.78%3.20%2.54%1.73%1.62%2.34%2.58%2.41%2.21%3.14%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWZ and SWNTX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWZ has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to SWNTX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWZ dropped -21.49% vs SWNTX's -13.26%.

SWNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWZ and SWNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer