PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWTYX vs. PCGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWTYX vs. PCGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS U.S. Allocation Fund (PWTYX) and PACE Global Fixed Income Investments (PCGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWTYX achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than PCGLX's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, PWTYX has outperformed PCGLX with an annualized return of 9.98%, while PCGLX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.01% annualized return.


PWTYX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.19%
YTD
8.36%
6M
8.57%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
9.98%

PCGLX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.70%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
0.24%
1Y
2.90%
3Y*
3.14%
5Y*
-1.86%
10Y*
0.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWTYX vs. PCGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWTYX
UBS U.S. Allocation Fund
8.36%13.28%14.01%17.73%-17.04%16.19%17.66%23.75%-7.80%15.77%
PCGLX
PACE Global Fixed Income Investments
-0.07%7.59%-1.98%4.34%-15.58%-3.99%10.23%6.93%-3.17%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PWTYX and PCGLX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

0.08

Over the past year, PWTYX and PCGLX have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWTYX vs. PCGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWTYX
PWTYX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PWTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PWTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PCGLX
PCGLX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PCGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWTYX vs. PCGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS U.S. Allocation Fund (PWTYX) and PACE Global Fixed Income Investments (PCGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWTYXPCGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.10

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

0.63

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.14

1.77

+12.36

PWTYX vs. PCGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWTYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the PCGLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWTYX and PCGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWTYXPCGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

0.52

+2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

-0.30

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.00

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.42

+0.11

Drawdowns

PWTYX vs. PCGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWTYX drawdown since its inception was -51.86%, which is greater than PCGLX's maximum drawdown of -24.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWTYX and PCGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWTYXPCGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.86%

-24.81%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.87%

-4.52%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-7.41%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.84%

-23.63%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.34%

-24.81%

-0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.11%

+11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-6.50%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.57%

+0.18%

Volatility

PWTYX vs. PCGLX - Volatility Comparison

UBS U.S. Allocation Fund (PWTYX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to PACE Global Fixed Income Investments (PCGLX) at 1.79%. This indicates that PWTYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWTYXPCGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

1.79%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

4.03%

+4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.86%

5.51%

+4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

6.35%

+6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

5.72%

+7.22%

PWTYX vs. PCGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWTYX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGLX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWTYX vs. PCGLX - Dividend Comparison

PWTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, more than PCGLX's 3.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCGLX
PACE Global Fixed Income Investments
3.79%3.37%3.74%3.31%1.82%4.74%3.41%1.89%1.81%1.46%3.14%3.30%
PWTYX
UBS U.S. Allocation Fund
8.66%9.38%8.32%1.61%9.95%16.86%5.85%2.22%11.82%2.53%0.68%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWTYX and PCGLX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWTYX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to PCGLX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWTYX dropped -51.86% vs PCGLX's -24.81%.

PWTYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWTYX and PCGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer