PCGLX vs. EMPTX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PCGLX (PACE Global Fixed Income Investments) and EMPTX (UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund) are both mutual funds - PCGLX is a Global Bonds fund managed by UBS, while EMPTX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by UBS. Over the past 5 years, PCGLX returned -1.81%/yr vs 6.89%/yr for EMPTX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCGLX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EMPTX.

Performance

PCGLX vs. EMPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Global Fixed Income Investments (PCGLX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCGLX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than EMPTX's 30.13% return.

PCGLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: -0.19%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 2.39%
• 3Y*: 2.88%
• 5Y*: -1.81%
• 10Y*: -0.10%

EMPTX

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: 6.62%
• YTD: 30.13%
• 6M: 32.40%
• 1Y: 64.07%
• 3Y*: 24.56%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCGLX vs. EMPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PCGLX PACE Global Fixed Income Investments	-0.19%	7.59%	-1.98%	4.34%	-15.58%	-3.99%	10.23%	6.93%	-1.19%
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	30.13%	43.82%	2.51%	8.92%	-25.38%	-9.36%	24.79%	14.98%	0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PCGLX and EMPTX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018	0.20

The correlation between PCGLX and EMPTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCGLX vs. EMPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCGLX

PCGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6
PCGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PCGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PCGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PCGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PCGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

EMPTX

EMPTX Risk / Return Rank: 92
EMPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
EMPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
EMPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EMPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCGLX vs. EMPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Global Fixed Income Investments (PCGLX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCGLX	EMPTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	3.35	-2.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	3.93	-3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.61	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	4.84	-4.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.52	18.35	-16.83

PCGLX vs. EMPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the EMPTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGLX and EMPTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCGLX vs. EMPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGLX drawdown since its inception was -24.81%, smaller than the maximum EMPTX drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGLX and EMPTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCGLX	EMPTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.81%	-46.03%	+21.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.52%	-14.50%	+9.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.41%	-15.50%	+8.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.63%	-41.36%	+17.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.22%	-0.29%	-10.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-18.28%	+11.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	3.70%	-2.06%

Volatility

PCGLX vs. EMPTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Global Fixed Income Investments (PCGLX) is 1.52%, while UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that PCGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCGLX	EMPTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	10.61%	-9.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.14%	18.48%	-14.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.53%	20.96%	-15.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.36%	19.72%	-13.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.72%	19.59%	-13.87%

PCGLX vs. EMPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCGLX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than EMPTX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCGLX vs. EMPTX - Dividend Comparison

PCGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than EMPTX's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	1.47%	1.91%	3.40%	3.20%	3.84%	11.93%	1.50%	2.75%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PCGLX PACE Global Fixed Income Investments	3.80%	3.37%	3.74%	3.31%	1.82%	4.74%	3.41%	1.89%	1.81%	1.46%	3.14%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCGLX and EMPTX in my portfolio?

PCGLX and EMPTX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCGLX or EMPTX?

EMPTX has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to PCGLX (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCGLX dropped -24.81% vs EMPTX's -46.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.