PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWS vs. UPAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PWS vs. UPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PWS vs. UPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PWS
Pacer WealthShield ETF
-0.91%8.05%14.01%-3.58%-12.31%
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
5.18%23.87%-2.26%5.73%-30.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWS achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than UPAR's 5.18% return.


PWS

1D
0.28%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
-0.91%
6M
0.33%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*

UPAR

1D
2.67%
1M
-7.86%
YTD
5.18%
6M
8.43%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PWS vs. UPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UPAR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PWS vs. UPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWS
PWS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWS Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

UPAR
UPAR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
UPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
UPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWS vs. UPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWSUPARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

1.34

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

1.82

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.26

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

2.01

-0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.75

7.18

-4.43

PWS vs. UPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWS Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the UPAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWS and UPAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWSUPARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

1.34

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.08

+0.39

Correlation

The correlation between PWS and UPAR is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PWS vs. UPAR - Dividend Comparison

PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than UPAR's 2.75% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PWS
Pacer WealthShield ETF
1.47%1.59%1.33%2.21%1.45%0.94%0.53%1.77%1.16%
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
2.75%3.28%3.32%3.04%4.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PWS vs. UPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, smaller than the maximum UPAR drawdown of -39.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and UPAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PWSUPARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.93%

-39.00%

+14.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-11.21%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-8.18%

+3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-22.49%

+13.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

3.13%

-0.82%

Volatility

PWS vs. UPAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) is 3.85%, while UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that PWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PWSUPARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

7.00%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

10.58%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

15.86%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

18.17%

-6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

18.17%

-3.66%