PWS vs. SRVR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PWS (Pacer WealthShield ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWS is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Pacer WealthShield Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PWS returned 1.66%/yr vs -3.29%/yr for SRVR. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SRVR.

Performance

PWS vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWS achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 9.16% return.

PWS

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: -2.37%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 1Y: 8.03%
• 3Y*: 6.67%
• 5Y*: 1.66%
• 10Y*: —

SRVR

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -7.99%
• 6M: 4.54%
• YTD: 9.16%
• 1Y: -0.06%
• 3Y*: 3.87%
• 5Y*: -3.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWS vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF	0.80%	8.05%	14.01%	-3.58%	-12.10%	14.43%	22.16%	1.36%	-6.53%
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF	9.16%	-1.99%	2.70%	6.84%	-31.90%	22.31%	11.99%	41.98%	-3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PWS and SRVR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018	0.34

Return for Risk

PWS vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWS

PWS Risk / Return Rank: 25
PWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
PWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PWS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
PWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
PWS Martin Ratio Rank: 25

SRVR

SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 9
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 9
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWS vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWS	SRVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	-0.00	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	0.12	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.01	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	-0.00	+1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.66	-0.01	+2.67

PWS vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWS Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWS and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PWS vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and SRVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWS	SRVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.93%	-40.99%	+16.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.88%	-14.78%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.47%	-18.34%	+7.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.93%	-40.99%	+16.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	-20.07%	+17.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.04%	-15.26%	+6.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	7.40%	-4.37%

Volatility

PWS vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) is 2.97%, while Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that PWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWS	SRVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	4.48%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.55%	14.02%	-6.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.56%	17.27%	-5.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.85%	19.84%	-7.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.35%	21.42%	-7.07%

PWS vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWS vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than SRVR's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF	1.30%	1.59%	1.33%	2.21%	1.45%	0.94%	0.53%	1.77%	1.16%
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF	2.80%	2.67%	2.00%	3.69%	1.70%	1.19%	1.59%	1.61%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWS and SRVR in my portfolio?

PWS and SRVR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PWS or SRVR?

SRVR has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to PWS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWS dropped -24.93% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

Which ETF is better, PWS or SRVR?

On 5-year performance, PWS leads with 1.66% vs -3.29% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PWS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PWS or SRVR?

Over the 5-year period, PWS has performed better with a 1.66% return vs -3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWS or SRVR?

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWS or SRVR?

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.30% for PWS.

What is the main difference between PWS and SRVR?

PWS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SRVR is REIT. PWS tracks Pacer WealthShield Index, while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWS and 0.49% for SRVR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.