PWS vs. PTLC
PWS (Pacer WealthShield ETF) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWS is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Pacer WealthShield Index, while PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PWS returned 0.31%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for PTLC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PWS vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWS achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly lower than PTLC's 5.53% return.
PWS
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PTLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 21.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
PWS vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | -2.18% | 8.05% | 14.01% | -3.58% | -12.10% | 14.43% | 22.16% | 1.36% | -3.29% | 0.96% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 5.53% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | -8.62% | 27.90% | -1.15% | 17.58% | 1.49% | 0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWS and PTLC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PWS and PTLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PWS vs. PTLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PWS
PTLC
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
PWS
PTLC
Technology
PWS
PTLC
Consumer Cyclical
PWS
PTLC
Industrials
PWS
PTLC
Utilities
PWS
PTLC
Communication Services
PWS
PTLC
Energy
PWS
PTLC
Basic Materials
PWS
-
PTLC
Consumer Defensive
PWS
-
PTLC
Financial Services
PWS
-
PTLC
Real Estate
PWS
-
PTLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWS vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank
PWS
PTLC
PWS vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWS | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.34 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.45 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 9.71 | -7.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWS | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.91 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.92 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.70 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
PWS vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and PTLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWS | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.93% | -26.63% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.88% | -8.77% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.47% | -15.17% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -15.17% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -0.74% | -5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -5.64% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.21% | +0.55% |
Volatility
PWS vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) is 2.64%, while Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that PWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWS | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 2.88% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.18% | 8.15% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 11.27% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.93% | 11.73% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 13.17% | +1.22% |
PWS vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PWS and PTLC have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PWS vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison
PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than PTLC's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | 1.49% | 1.59% | 1.33% | 2.21% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.53% | 1.77% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWS and PTLC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTLC has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to PWS (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWS dropped -24.93% vs PTLC's -26.63%.
On 5-year performance, PTLC leads with 10.72% vs 0.31% for PWS. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PWS has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PWS and PTLC have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
PWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.01% for PTLC.
PWS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. PWS tracks Pacer WealthShield Index, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index.
PTLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWS and PTLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer