PWS vs. INDS
PWS (Pacer WealthShield ETF) and INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWS is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Pacer WealthShield Index, while INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PWS returned 0.31%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for INDS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PWS vs. INDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWS achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly lower than INDS's 6.59% return.
PWS
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
INDS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- —
PWS vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | -2.18% | 8.05% | 14.01% | -3.58% | -12.10% | 14.43% | 22.16% | 1.36% | -6.53% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 6.59% | 7.78% | -12.69% | 17.72% | -32.68% | 54.61% | 12.62% | 42.25% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWS and INDS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.32 |
The correlation between PWS and INDS shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PWS vs. INDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PWS
INDS
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
PWS
INDS
-
Technology
PWS
INDS
-
Consumer Cyclical
PWS
INDS
-
Industrials
PWS
INDS
-
Utilities
PWS
INDS
-
Communication Services
PWS
INDS
-
Energy
PWS
INDS
-
Basic Materials
PWS
-
INDS
-
Consumer Defensive
PWS
-
INDS
-
Financial Services
PWS
-
INDS
-
Real Estate
PWS
-
INDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWS vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank
PWS
INDS
PWS vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWS | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.81 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 2.44 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWS | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 0.61 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.04 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.38 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
PWS vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, smaller than the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and INDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWS | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.93% | -40.17% | +15.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.88% | -12.23% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.47% | -26.96% | +16.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -40.17% | +15.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -20.51% | +14.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -15.57% | +6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 4.04% | -1.28% |
Volatility
PWS vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) is 2.64%, while Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that PWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWS | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 5.23% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.18% | 12.10% | -4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 16.23% | -4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.93% | 20.16% | -8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 23.11% | -8.72% |
PWS vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PWS and INDS have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PWS vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison
PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than INDS's 3.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 3.55% | 3.70% | 3.75% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 1.24% | 1.68% | 2.26% | 1.81% |
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | 1.49% | 1.59% | 1.33% | 2.21% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.53% | 1.77% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWS and INDS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INDS has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to PWS (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWS dropped -24.93% vs INDS's -40.17%.
On 5-year performance, INDS leads with 0.82% vs 0.31% for PWS. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PWS has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, INDS has performed better with a 0.82% return vs 0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PWS and INDS have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.49% for PWS.
PWS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while INDS is REIT. PWS tracks Pacer WealthShield Index, while INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index.
PWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWS and INDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer