PWS vs. DWAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PWS (Pacer WealthShield ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWS is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Pacer WealthShield Index, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. PWS is passively managed, while DWAT is actively managed. PWS charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.

Performance

PWS vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PWS

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -0.99%
• YTD: -2.18%
• 6M: -3.95%
• 1Y: 7.28%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 0.31%
• 10Y*: —

DWAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWS vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF	-4.72%
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%

PWS vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PWS	DWAT
Healthcare	39.6%	5.3%
Technology	20.6%	10.2%
Consumer Cyclical	19.7%	5.2%
Industrials	19.0%	25.1%
Utilities	0.8%	5.3%
Communication Services	0.2%	3.4%
Energy	0.0%	4.2%
Basic Materials	-	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.5%
Financial Services	-	27.2%
Real Estate	-	5.1%

Return for Risk

PWS vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWS

PWS Risk / Return Rank: 21
PWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
PWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PWS Omega Ratio Rank: 19
PWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
PWS Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWS vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PWS	DWAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.64	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PWS	DWAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	—	—

Drawdowns

PWS vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and DWAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWS	DWAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.93%	0.00%	-24.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	0.00%	-5.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.11%	0.00%	-9.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PWS	DWAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.47%	0.00%	+11.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.93%	0.00%	+11.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.39%	0.00%	+14.39%

PWS vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWS vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF	1.49%	1.59%	1.33%	2.21%	1.45%	0.94%	0.53%	1.77%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PWS or DWAT?

On fees, PWS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWS or DWAT?

PWS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWS or DWAT?

PWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

What is the main difference between PWS and DWAT?

PWS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWS and 1.83% for DWAT.