PWRZ vs. JUNZ
PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and JUNZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRZ is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while JUNZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index. PWRZ is actively managed, while JUNZ is passively managed. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JUNZ.
Performance
PWRZ vs. JUNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PWRZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUNZ
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 1Y
- 16.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- —
PWRZ vs. JUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% |
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF | 0.50% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRZ vs. JUNZ — Risk / Return Rank
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JUNZ
PWRZ vs. JUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWRZ | JUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRZ vs. JUNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum JUNZ drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and JUNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRZ | JUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -17.88% | +17.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.72% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -4.22% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility
PWRZ vs. JUNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRZ | JUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.35% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 11.82% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 11.73% | — |
PWRZ vs. JUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than JUNZ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRZ vs. JUNZ - Dividend Comparison
PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF | 2.13% | 2.30% | 3.97% | 6.03% | 0.56% | 0.32% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PWRZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWRZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JUNZ.
JUNZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
PWRZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while JUNZ is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.79% for JUNZ.
Find the right allocation for PWRZ and JUNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer