PWRZ vs. DECZ
PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and DECZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRZ is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while DECZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. PWRZ is actively managed, while DECZ is passively managed. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for DECZ.
Performance
PWRZ vs. DECZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DECZ
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $85.66K | $78.73K | $526.69K | |
| $5.57K | $7.64K | $7.64K |
PWRZ vs. DECZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -2.28% |
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF | -2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRZ and DECZ is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRZ vs. DECZ — Risk / Return Rank
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DECZ
PWRZ vs. DECZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWRZ | DECZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRZ vs. DECZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was -3.62%, smaller than the maximum DECZ drawdown of -16.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and DECZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRZ | DECZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.62% | -16.57% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -3.21% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.03% | -3.03% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility
PWRZ vs. DECZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRZ | DECZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 10.43% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 12.69% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 12.39% | -0.40% |
PWRZ vs. DECZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DECZ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRZ vs. DECZ - Dividend Comparison
PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DECZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF | 3.11% | 3.28% | 2.55% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 0.46% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRZ and DECZ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PWRZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWRZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DECZ.
DECZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
PWRZ is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while DECZ is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.79% for DECZ.
Find the right allocation for PWRZ and DECZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer