PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWRD vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWRD vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -7.27% return.


PWRD

1D
-2.91%
1M
-4.26%
6M
9.17%
YTD
14.65%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-0.61%
1M
-5.92%
6M
-22.32%
YTD
-7.27%
1Y
-0.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRD vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
14.65%32.84%28.54%7.55%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-7.27%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRD and SHLD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWRD vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRD
PWRD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PWRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWRD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PWRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRD vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWRDSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.01

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

-0.03

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

-0.08

+5.21

PWRD vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWRD and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWRD vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, roughly equal to the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRDSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.87%

-25.40%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.12%

-25.40%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-22.99%

+12.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-3.90%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

10.30%

-5.78%

Volatility

PWRD vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) at 8.28%. This indicates that PWRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRDSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.09%

8.28%

+3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.61%

19.79%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

25.12%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.23%

21.54%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

21.54%

+1.69%

PWRD vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWRD vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

PWRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SHLD's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
0.06%0.22%0.49%0.78%0.91%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.71%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWRD and SHLD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWRD has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to SHLD (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWRD dropped -25.87% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, PWRD leads with 23.10% vs -0.87% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PWRD has performed better with a 23.10% return vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

SHLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.06% for PWRD.

PWRD is categorized as Energy Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.50% for SHLD.

PWRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWRD and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer