PWRD vs. MDST
PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) and MDST (Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PWRD returned 36.33% vs 20.94% for MDST. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWRD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for MDST.
Performance
PWRD vs. MDST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 21.92% return, which is significantly higher than MDST's 16.53% return.
PWRD
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 21.92%
- 6M
- 19.81%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDST
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRD vs. MDST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 21.92% | 32.84% | 5.23% |
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 16.53% | 7.09% | 17.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRD and MDST is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PWRD and MDST has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRD vs. MDST — Risk / Return Rank
PWRD
MDST
PWRD vs. MDST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWRD | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.12 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 8.43 | +0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRD vs. MDST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, which is greater than MDST's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and MDST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRD | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.87% | -14.19% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.12% | -6.74% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -2.20% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -2.20% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 2.49% | +1.76% |
Volatility
PWRD vs. MDST - Volatility Comparison
TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST) at 4.87%. This indicates that PWRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRD | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 4.87% | +5.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.67% | 8.71% | +11.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.31% | 12.45% | +12.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 16.11% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 16.11% | +6.78% |
PWRD vs. MDST - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MDST's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRD vs. MDST - Dividend Comparison
PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 9.20% | 10.22% | 6.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.78% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRD and MDST have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWRD has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to MDST (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWRD dropped -25.87% vs MDST's -14.19%.
On 1-year performance, PWRD leads with 36.33% vs 20.94% for MDST. On fees, PWRD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MDST has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PWRD has performed better with a 36.33% return vs 20.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PWRD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MDST.
MDST has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.
They also come from different issuers: TCW and Westwood. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.80% for MDST.
MDST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWRD and MDST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer