PWR vs. VH2.DE
PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) and VH2.DE (Friedrich Vorwerk Group SE) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, PWR returned 50.60%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for VH2.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PWR vs. VH2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PWR is traded in USD, while VH2.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VH2.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 67.76% return, which is significantly higher than VH2.DE's -20.09% return.
PWR
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- 67.76%
- 6M
- 61.62%
- 1Y
- 97.52%
- 3Y*
- 56.60%
- 5Y*
- 50.60%
- 10Y*
- 41.17%
VH2.DE
- 1D
- 6.60%
- 1M
- -12.70%
- YTD
- -20.09%
- 6M
- -19.45%
- 1Y
- 12.44%
- 3Y*
- 85.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- —
PWR vs. VH2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 67.76% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 39.61% |
VH2.DE Friedrich Vorwerk Group SE | -20.09% | 239.49% | 67.29% | -26.65% | -26.57% | -41.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWR and VH2.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWR vs. VH2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PWR
VH2.DE
PWR vs. VH2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Friedrich Vorwerk Group SE (VH2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWR | VH2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.09 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.73 | 0.27 | +5.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | 0.58 | +17.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWR vs. VH2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than VH2.DE's maximum drawdown of -84.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and VH2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWR | VH2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -84.51% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -46.42% | +29.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.89% | -46.42% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -83.17% | +49.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -37.98% | +28.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -46.85% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 21.54% | -16.13% |
Volatility
PWR vs. VH2.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 13.07%, while Friedrich Vorwerk Group SE (VH2.DE) has a volatility of 16.41%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VH2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWR | VH2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.07% | 16.41% | -3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.74% | 41.54% | -10.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.12% | 57.75% | -20.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 54.16% | -18.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 53.40% | -19.62% |
Dividends
PWR vs. VH2.DE - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than VH2.DE's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
VH2.DE Friedrich Vorwerk Group SE | 1.69% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.77% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PWR vs. VH2.DE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Friedrich Vorwerk Group SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PWR and VH2.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PWR and VH2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer