PWR vs. SNOW
PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) and SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) are both stocks. PWR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, PWR returned 52.48%/yr vs -1.41%/yr for SNOW. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PWR vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 66.46% return, which is significantly higher than SNOW's 5.89% return.
PWR
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 66.46%
- 6M
- 64.67%
- 1Y
- 95.02%
- 3Y*
- 55.93%
- 5Y*
- 52.48%
- 10Y*
- 40.77%
SNOW
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 39.12%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- -1.41%
- 10Y*
- —
PWR vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 66.46% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 38.78% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 5.89% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 14.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWR and SNOW is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.29 |
The correlation between PWR and SNOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PWR:
$106.80B
SNOW:
$80.23B
PWR:
$7.29
SNOW:
-$3.53
PWR:
3.55
SNOW:
15.66
PWR:
11.81
SNOW:
38.93
PWR:
$29.99B
SNOW:
$5.03B
PWR:
$4.08B
SNOW:
$3.38B
PWR:
$2.40B
SNOW:
-$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWR vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
PWR
SNOW
PWR vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWR | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.10 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.59 | 0.17 | +5.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.25 | 0.37 | +16.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWR vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than SNOW's maximum drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and SNOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWR | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -72.99% | -24.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -56.30% | +39.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.89% | -56.30% | +22.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -72.99% | +39.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.57% | -42.20% | +31.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -49.00% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 26.01% | -20.48% |
Volatility
PWR vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 11.78%, while Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a volatility of 35.87%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWR | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 35.87% | -24.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.15% | 52.67% | -22.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.23% | 65.44% | -28.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.76% | 61.91% | -26.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.79% | 62.61% | -28.82% |
Dividends
PWR vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PWR vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PWR vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PWR and SNOW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOW has higher volatility (35.87%) compared to PWR (11.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs SNOW's -72.99%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWR and SNOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer