PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWR vs. NEGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PWR vs. NEGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 67.76% return, which is significantly higher than NEGG's -63.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed NEGG with an annualized return of 41.17%, while NEGG has yielded a comparatively lower -23.00% annualized return.


PWR

1D
3.58%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
67.76%
6M
61.62%
1Y
97.52%
3Y*
56.60%
5Y*
50.60%
10Y*
41.17%

NEGG

1D
-0.43%
1M
-20.37%
YTD
-63.49%
6M
-70.11%
1Y
77.83%
3Y*
-9.01%
5Y*
-38.30%
10Y*
-23.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWR vs. NEGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
67.76%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%
NEGG
Newegg Commerce, Inc.
-63.49%540.26%-68.54%-3.82%-87.37%149.88%52.57%-70.00%-35.23%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PWR and NEGG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2010

0.11

The correlation between PWR and NEGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PWR:

$7.29

NEGG:

-$1.16

PS Ratio

PWR:

3.58

NEGG:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

PWR:

$29.99B

NEGG:

$1.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PWR:

$4.08B

NEGG:

$148.16M

EBITDA (TTM)

PWR:

$2.40B

NEGG:

-$19.73M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWR vs. NEGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NEGG
NEGG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NEGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEGG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NEGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEGG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWR vs. NEGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWRNEGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.25

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

0.90

+4.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

1.35

+16.74

PWR vs. NEGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the NEGG Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and NEGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWR vs. NEGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, roughly equal to the maximum NEGG drawdown of -99.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and NEGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRNEGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-99.83%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.11%

-86.90%

+69.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.89%

-90.28%

+56.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-99.74%

+65.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.53%

-99.74%

+54.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.87%

-99.08%

+89.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-85.54%

+38.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

58.06%

-52.65%

Volatility

PWR vs. NEGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 13.07%, while Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) has a volatility of 22.82%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRNEGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.07%

22.82%

-9.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.74%

64.39%

-33.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.12%

182.18%

-145.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.79%

152.40%

-116.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.78%

145.24%

-111.46%

Dividends

PWR vs. NEGG - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while NEGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NEGG
Newegg Commerce, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%

Financials

PWR vs. NEGG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Newegg Commerce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.87B
347.84M
(PWR) Total Revenue
(NEGG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PWR and NEGG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEGG has higher volatility (22.82%) compared to PWR (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs NEGG's -99.83%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWR and NEGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer