PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWR vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PWR vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 49.97% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 38.19%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively lower 23.18% annualized return.


PWR

1D
0.64%
1M
-9.91%
6M
35.57%
YTD
49.97%
1Y
56.98%
3Y*
46.60%
5Y*
48.08%
10Y*
38.19%
ALL TIME*
17.05%

MSFT

1D
2.15%
1M
6.03%
6M
-12.13%
YTD
-16.45%
1Y
-20.50%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
23.18%
ALL TIME*
24.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWR vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
49.97%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-16.45%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PWR and MSFT is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 1998

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between PWR and MSFT has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PWR:

$94.92B

MSFT:

$2.99T

EPS

PWR:

$7.28

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

PWR:

86.89

MSFT:

23.96

PEG Ratio

PWR:

4.30

MSFT:

1.68

PS Ratio

PWR:

3.20

MSFT:

9.43

PB Ratio

PWR:

10.64

MSFT:

7.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

PWR:

$29.99B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PWR:

$4.08B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

PWR:

$2.40B

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWR vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWR vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWRMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.88

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

-0.60

+3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

-1.10

+9.42

PWR vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWR vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-69.38%

-27.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.94%

-34.50%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.89%

-34.50%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-37.15%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.53%

-37.15%

-8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.43%

-25.32%

+5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.72%

-21.80%

-24.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

18.74%

-11.87%

Volatility

PWR vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.25%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.56%

10.25%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.89%

24.51%

+6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.96%

27.52%

+11.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.07%

27.07%

+9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.90%

27.15%

+6.75%

Dividends

PWR vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than MSFT's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.88%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.07%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PWR vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
7.87B
82.89B
(PWR) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PWR vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quanta Services, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
14.1%
67.6%
Portfolio components
PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PWR and MSFT have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWR has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to MSFT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWR and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer