PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWER vs. ERTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PWER vs. ERTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) and Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PWER vs. ERTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PWER
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF
16.14%35.28%-3.50%9.72%
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
0.65%18.47%-13.56%10.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWER achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly higher than ERTH's 0.65% return.


PWER

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.58%
YTD
16.14%
6M
23.78%
1Y
59.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ERTH

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.05%
YTD
0.65%
6M
-1.70%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
0.35%
5Y*
-5.43%
10Y*
7.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PWER vs. ERTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWER has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ERTH's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PWER vs. ERTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWER
PWER Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWER Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PWER Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWER Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ERTH
ERTH Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ERTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERTH Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ERTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERTH Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWER vs. ERTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) and Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWERERTHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.37

1.10

+1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

1.70

+1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.22

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

1.84

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.34

7.35

+9.99

PWER vs. ERTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWER Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the ERTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWER and ERTH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWERERTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

1.10

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.19

+0.84

Correlation

The correlation between PWER and ERTH is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PWER vs. ERTH - Dividend Comparison

PWER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than ERTH's 1.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWER
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF
1.18%1.37%1.05%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
1.48%1.46%1.00%1.28%1.22%15.33%0.21%0.71%0.61%0.87%1.06%0.79%

Drawdowns

PWER vs. ERTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWER drawdown since its inception was -29.68%, smaller than the maximum ERTH drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWER and ERTH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PWERERTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.68%

-64.45%

+34.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.01%

-10.65%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-32.20%

+29.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.59%

-21.41%

+14.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

3.19%

+0.35%

Volatility

PWER vs. ERTH - Volatility Comparison

Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) and Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) have volatilities of 6.96% and 6.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PWERERTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

6.69%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

12.52%

+4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.19%

20.47%

+4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.69%

22.90%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.69%

22.62%

+1.07%