PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWC vs. LOPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PWC vs. LOPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PWC vs. LOPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
2.60%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%12.27%
LOPP
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
4.90%22.61%9.89%4.74%-15.04%19.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWC achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than LOPP's 4.90% return.


PWC

1D
1.17%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
2.60%
6M
2.73%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
9.15%

LOPP

1D
3.09%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
4.90%
6M
7.80%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PWC vs. LOPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LOPP's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PWC vs. LOPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWC
PWC Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

LOPP
LOPP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWC vs. LOPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWCLOPPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

1.70

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

2.38

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

2.59

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.23

10.96

-7.73

PWC vs. LOPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWC Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the LOPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWC and LOPP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWCLOPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

1.70

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.39

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.47

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between PWC and LOPP is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PWC vs. LOPP - Dividend Comparison

PWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than LOPP's 0.79% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
1.73%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
LOPP
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
0.79%0.83%1.88%2.23%2.01%1.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PWC vs. LOPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWC drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than LOPP's maximum drawdown of -25.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWC and LOPP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PWCLOPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.13%

-25.28%

-52.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-12.31%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-25.28%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.36%

-6.90%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.46%

-8.46%

-28.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.91%

-0.46%

Volatility

PWC vs. LOPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) is 3.07%, while Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that PWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PWCLOPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

7.24%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

11.79%

-4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

18.94%

-4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.75%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

17.61%

+1.23%