PWB vs. GQGU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU).

PWB and GQGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PWB is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. GQGU is an actively managed fund by GQG Partners. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.

Performance

PWB vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PWB vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	-0.93%	8.54%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	9.61%	-1.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 9.61% return.

PWB

• 1D: 3.98%
• 1M: -7.08%
• YTD: -0.93%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 31.12%
• 3Y*: 24.82%
• 5Y*: 12.92%
• 10Y*: 15.44%

GQGU

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 6M: 7.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWB vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.

PWB

Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF

GQGU

GQG US Equity ETF

Return for Risk

PWB vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWB

PWB Risk / Return Rank: 80
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWB vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PWB	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PWB	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	1.25	-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between PWB and GQGU is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

PWB vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.37%	0.31%	0.04%	0.21%	0.58%	0.97%	0.54%	0.82%	0.67%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PWB vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and GQGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWB	GQGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.58%	-6.65%	-45.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.61%	-1.96%	-6.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.29%	-2.20%	-6.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PWB	GQGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.23%	9.55%	+13.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.96%	9.55%	+11.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.58%	9.55%	+11.03%