PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVQNX vs. JLKYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVQNX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVQNX achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly lower than JLKYX's 12.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PVQNX having a 11.14% annualized return and JLKYX not far ahead at 11.51%.


PVQNX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.73%
YTD
11.13%
6M
11.67%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
11.14%

JLKYX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.21%
YTD
12.46%
6M
12.87%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
19.72%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVQNX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PVQNX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund
11.13%19.82%13.19%19.01%-17.27%17.71%13.93%24.43%-7.44%19.64%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
12.46%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PVQNX and JLKYX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.98

The correlation between PVQNX and JLKYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVQNX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVQNX
PVQNX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PVQNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVQNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVQNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PVQNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVQNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVQNX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PVQNXJLKYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.10

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

13.76

+0.39

PVQNX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVQNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVQNX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PVQNXJLKYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.35

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.65

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.71

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.65

+0.05

Drawdowns

PVQNX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVQNX drawdown since its inception was -30.68%, smaller than the maximum JLKYX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVQNX and JLKYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVQNXJLKYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-32.55%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-9.16%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-16.11%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.30%

-25.75%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.68%

-32.55%

+1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.42%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-4.66%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.06%

-0.23%

Volatility

PVQNX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) is 3.17%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that PVQNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVQNXJLKYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

3.56%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

9.61%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

12.08%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

15.21%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.24%

16.20%

-1.96%

PVQNX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVQNX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PVQNX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

PVQNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than JLKYX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.21%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%
PVQNX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund
4.06%4.23%4.22%2.37%2.62%5.08%1.41%3.82%6.65%2.10%2.43%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PVQNX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLKYX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to PVQNX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVQNX dropped -30.68% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

PVQNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVQNX and JLKYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer