PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVMIX vs. MCMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVMIX vs. MCMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) and Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVMIX achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than MCMVX's 17.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PVMIX having a 12.96% annualized return and MCMVX not far ahead at 13.42%.


PVMIX

1D
0.52%
1M
0.93%
YTD
12.75%
6M
11.23%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
12.96%

MCMVX

1D
1.30%
1M
1.78%
YTD
17.13%
6M
15.37%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVMIX vs. MCMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
12.75%6.09%33.38%11.04%-5.95%30.97%6.50%26.69%-11.07%14.63%
MCMVX
Monongahela All Cap Value Fund
17.13%9.74%15.38%12.18%-7.73%22.57%13.24%26.98%-8.15%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PVMIX and MCMVX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2013

0.90

The correlation between PVMIX and MCMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVMIX vs. MCMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVMIX
PVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MCMVX
MCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVMIX vs. MCMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) and Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PVMIXMCMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.33

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.81

12.15

-3.33

PVMIX vs. MCMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the MCMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVMIX and MCMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PVMIX vs. MCMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVMIX drawdown since its inception was -56.76%, which is greater than MCMVX's maximum drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVMIX and MCMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVMIXMCMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.76%

-36.75%

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-8.56%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.78%

-21.06%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.05%

-21.06%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.34%

-36.75%

-4.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

0.00%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-4.06%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.34%

-0.25%

Volatility

PVMIX vs. MCMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) is 3.54%, while Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that PVMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVMIXMCMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.68%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

10.96%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

14.74%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

16.73%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

18.05%

+1.14%

PVMIX vs. MCMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVMIX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than MCMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PVMIX vs. MCMVX - Dividend Comparison

PVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than MCMVX's 5.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCMVX
Monongahela All Cap Value Fund
5.56%6.51%5.41%3.23%4.79%7.61%1.25%3.09%6.87%10.44%2.13%1.75%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
6.41%7.22%33.98%4.63%7.12%11.44%1.38%5.11%13.23%6.92%1.58%11.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


PVMIX and MCMVX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCMVX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to PVMIX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVMIX dropped -56.76% vs MCMVX's -36.75%.

MCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVMIX and MCMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer