PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVMIX vs. PLGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVMIX vs. PLGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVMIX achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly higher than PLGIX's 6.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PVMIX has underperformed PLGIX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while PLGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.21% annualized return.


PVMIX

1D
0.99%
1M
2.31%
YTD
12.36%
6M
12.07%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
12.56%

PLGIX

1D
-0.29%
1M
6.85%
YTD
6.11%
6M
5.10%
1Y
15.54%
3Y*
35.60%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
20.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVMIX vs. PLGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
12.36%6.09%33.38%11.04%-5.95%30.97%6.50%26.69%-11.07%14.63%
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
6.11%11.59%83.01%40.40%-34.05%21.49%36.06%34.89%3.44%33.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PVMIX and PLGIX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2003

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between PVMIX and PLGIX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVMIX vs. PLGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVMIX
PVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PLGIX
PLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVMIX vs. PLGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PVMIXPLGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.19

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

0.88

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

2.73

+6.93

PVMIX vs. PLGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the PLGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVMIX and PLGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PVMIXPLGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.06

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.60

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.80

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.45

+0.08

Drawdowns

PVMIX vs. PLGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVMIX drawdown since its inception was -56.76%, roughly equal to the maximum PLGIX drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVMIX and PLGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVMIXPLGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.76%

-55.43%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-18.32%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.78%

-21.39%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.05%

-40.63%

+23.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.34%

-40.63%

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-13.26%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

5.90%

-3.83%

Volatility

PVMIX vs. PLGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) is 3.11%, while Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that PVMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVMIXPLGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.61%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.49%

12.06%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

15.25%

-3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

30.12%

-11.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

25.44%

-6.22%

PVMIX vs. PLGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVMIX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PLGIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PVMIX vs. PLGIX - Dividend Comparison

PVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than PLGIX's 13.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
13.62%14.45%63.77%5.99%11.57%11.34%7.03%8.01%16.41%7.05%4.64%12.51%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
6.43%7.22%33.98%4.63%7.12%11.44%1.38%5.11%13.23%6.92%1.58%11.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


PVMIX and PLGIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLGIX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to PVMIX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVMIX dropped -56.76% vs PLGIX's -55.43%.

PVMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVMIX and PLGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer