PVI vs. BSMR
PVI (Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF) and BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Invesco - PVI tracks the ICE US Municipal AMT-Free VRDO Constrained Index while BSMR tracks the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PVI returned 1.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BSMR. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. PVI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMR.
Performance
PVI vs. BSMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PVI achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than BSMR's 0.99% return.
PVI
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 2.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
BSMR
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- —
PVI vs. BSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVI Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF | 0.68% | 3.12% | 2.43% | 2.74% | 0.89% | -0.07% | 0.17% | 0.33% |
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.99% | 3.10% | 1.51% | 4.47% | -7.60% | 1.09% | 4.97% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVI and BSMR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | -0.01 |
PVI vs. BSMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PVI
BSMR
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
PVI
BSMR
Basic Materials
PVI
-
BSMR
-
Communication Services
PVI
-
BSMR
-
Consumer Defensive
PVI
-
BSMR
-
Energy
PVI
-
BSMR
-
Financial Services
PVI
-
BSMR
Healthcare
PVI
-
BSMR
-
Industrials
PVI
-
BSMR
-
Real Estate
PVI
-
BSMR
-
Technology
PVI
-
BSMR
-
Utilities
PVI
-
BSMR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PVI vs. BSMR — Risk / Return Rank
PVI
BSMR
PVI vs. BSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PVI | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 3.33 | -2.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 5.56 | -4.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.74 | -0.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 7.29 | -5.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 23.18 | -15.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PVI | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 3.33 | -2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.16 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.21 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
PVI vs. BSMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVI drawdown since its inception was -4.10%, smaller than the maximum BSMR drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVI and BSMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PVI | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -13.49% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | -0.57% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.17% | -3.50% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.17% | -12.02% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -3.49% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.18% | +0.13% |
Volatility
PVI vs. BSMR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) at 0.36%. This indicates that PVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PVI | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 0.36% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | 0.92% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 1.25% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.97% | 3.03% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.75% | 5.73% | -3.98% |
PVI vs. BSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PVI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMR's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PVI vs. BSMR - Dividend Comparison
PVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than BSMR's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.72% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.72% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 1.49% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PVI Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF | 2.15% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 3.36% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.15% | 1.14% | 0.56% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PVI and BSMR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PVI has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to BSMR (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVI dropped -4.10% vs BSMR's -13.49%.
On 5-year performance, PVI leads with 1.95% vs 0.49% for BSMR. On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PVI has performed better with a 1.95% return vs 0.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PVI.
BSMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.15% for PVI.
PVI tracks ICE US Municipal AMT-Free VRDO Constrained Index, while BSMR tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PVI and 0.18% for BSMR.
BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PVI and BSMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer