PVI vs. AUSM
PVI (Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF) and AUSM (Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. PVI is passively managed, while AUSM is actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PVI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AUSM.
Performance
PVI vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PVI achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than AUSM's 1.00% return.
PVI
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 2.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
AUSM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PVI vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PVI Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF | 0.68% | 1.18% |
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 1.00% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVI and AUSM is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PVI vs. AUSM — Risk / Return Rank
PVI
AUSM
PVI vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PVI | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PVI | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 4.02 | -3.49 |
Drawdowns
PVI vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVI drawdown since its inception was -4.10%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVI and AUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PVI | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -0.42% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -0.09% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | — | — |
Volatility
PVI vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PVI | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 0.73% | +1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.97% | 0.73% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.75% | 0.73% | +1.02% |
PVI vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PVI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PVI vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison
PVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than AUSM's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 2.39% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PVI Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF | 2.15% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 3.36% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.15% | 1.14% | 0.56% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PVI and AUSM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PVI.
AUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 2.15% for PVI.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PVI and 0.18% for AUSM.
Find the right allocation for PVI and AUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer