PVI vs. AMUN
PVI (Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF) and AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. PVI is passively managed, while AMUN is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
PVI vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PVI achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than AMUN's 1.13% return.
PVI
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 2.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
AMUN
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PVI vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PVI Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF | 0.68% | 0.90% |
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.13% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVI and AMUN is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PVI vs. AMUN — Risk / Return Rank
PVI
AMUN
PVI vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PVI | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PVI | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 2.09 | -1.56 |
Drawdowns
PVI vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVI drawdown since its inception was -4.10%, which is greater than AMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVI and AMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PVI | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -0.61% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -0.09% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | — | — |
Volatility
PVI vs. AMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PVI | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 1.01% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.97% | 1.01% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.75% | 1.01% | +0.74% |
PVI vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PVI and AMUN have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PVI vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison
PVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than AMUN's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.89% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PVI Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF | 2.15% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 3.36% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.15% | 1.14% | 0.56% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PVI and AMUN have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PVI and AMUN have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
PVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.89% for AMUN.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and abrdn.
Find the right allocation for PVI and AMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer