PVH vs. COLM
PVH (PVH Corp.) and COLM (Columbia Sportswear Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Apparel Manufacturing industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, PVH returned -0.93%/yr vs 2.12%/yr for COLM. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PVH vs. COLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PVH achieves a 29.43% return, which is significantly higher than COLM's 8.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PVH has underperformed COLM with an annualized return of -0.93%, while COLM has yielded a comparatively higher 2.12% annualized return.
PVH
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 39.10%
- YTD
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- -0.49%
- 5Y*
- -3.53%
- 10Y*
- -0.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.97%
COLM
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- -6.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.78M | $35.43M | $35.09M | |
PVH PVH Corp. | $67.06M | $69.10M | $89.97M |
PVH vs. COLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVH PVH Corp. | 29.43% | -36.50% | -13.29% | 73.32% | -33.66% | 13.63% | -10.61% | 13.30% | -32.18% | 52.26% |
COLM Columbia Sportswear Company | 8.89% | -33.05% | 7.08% | -7.79% | -8.79% | 12.63% | -12.50% | 20.33% | 18.23% | 24.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVH and COLM is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1998 | 0.47 |
The correlation between PVH and COLM shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PVH:
$4.00B
COLM:
$3.04B
PVH:
$3.32
COLM:
$3.87
PVH:
26.13
COLM:
15.34
PVH:
0.46
COLM:
0.93
PVH:
0.82
COLM:
1.93
PVH:
$8.99B
COLM:
$3.41B
PVH:
$5.17B
COLM:
$1.77B
PVH:
$690.10M
COLM:
$303.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PVH vs. COLM — Risk / Return Rank
PVH
COLM
PVH vs. COLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PVH Corp. (PVH) and Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PVH | COLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.07 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 0.38 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 0.93 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PVH vs. COLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVH drawdown since its inception was -85.13%, which is greater than COLM's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVH and COLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PVH | COLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.13% | -63.18% | -21.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.93% | -19.10% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.90% | -46.09% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.58% | -51.16% | -12.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.67% | -53.92% | -28.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.85% | -43.20% | -4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -20.81% | -16.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.65% | 8.07% | +9.58% |
Volatility
PVH vs. COLM - Volatility Comparison
PVH Corp. (PVH) and Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) have volatilities of 9.67% and 9.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PVH | COLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.67% | 9.51% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.02% | 28.27% | +9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.11% | 40.03% | +7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.83% | 32.25% | +15.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.10% | 32.85% | +16.25% |
Dividends
PVH vs. COLM - Dividend Comparison
PVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than COLM's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLM Columbia Sportswear Company | 2.02% | 2.18% | 1.43% | 1.51% | 1.37% | 1.07% | 0.30% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.02% | 1.18% | 1.23% |
PVH PVH Corp. | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.21% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.20% |
Financials
PVH vs. COLM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PVH Corp. and Columbia Sportswear Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PVH vs. COLM - Profitability Comparison
PVH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PVH Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 2.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.6%.
COLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a gross profit of 358.43M and revenue of 614.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.
PVH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PVH Corp. reported an operating income of 118.70M and revenue of 2.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
COLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported an operating income of 35.05M and revenue of 614.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.
PVH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PVH Corp. reported a net income of 88.00M and revenue of 2.03B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
COLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a net income of 26.55M and revenue of 614.36M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PVH and COLM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PVH has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to COLM (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVH dropped -85.13% vs COLM's -63.18%.
PVH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PVH and COLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer