PortfoliosLab logo
COLM vs. LULU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COLM and LULU is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

COLM vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COLM:

-0.64

LULU:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

COLM:

-0.76

LULU:

0.25

Omega Ratio

COLM:

0.90

LULU:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

COLM:

-0.50

LULU:

-0.04

Martin Ratio

COLM:

-1.71

LULU:

-0.11

Ulcer Index

COLM:

13.03%

LULU:

18.20%

Daily Std Dev

COLM:

34.59%

LULU:

44.46%

Max Drawdown

COLM:

-63.18%

LULU:

-92.26%

Current Drawdown

COLM:

-39.24%

LULU:

-37.32%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COLM:

$3.54B

LULU:

$38.16B

EPS

COLM:

$3.86

LULU:

$14.64

PE Ratio

COLM:

16.77

LULU:

21.69

PEG Ratio

COLM:

2.66

LULU:

1.35

PS Ratio

COLM:

1.05

LULU:

3.60

PB Ratio

COLM:

2.13

LULU:

9.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

COLM:

$3.38B

LULU:

$8.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COLM:

$1.70B

LULU:

$5.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

COLM:

$316.37M

LULU:

$2.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLM achieves a -22.01% return, which is significantly lower than LULU's -16.20% return. Over the past 10 years, COLM has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of 2.62%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 18.01% annualized return.


COLM

YTD

-22.01%

1M

1.37%

6M

-19.18%

1Y

-21.94%

3Y*

-2.88%

5Y*

-0.03%

10Y*

2.62%

LULU

YTD

-16.20%

1M

22.45%

6M

1.69%

1Y

6.95%

3Y*

5.51%

5Y*

2.98%

10Y*

18.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Columbia Sportswear Company

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

COLM vs. LULU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COLM is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COLM is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COLM is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COLM is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COLM is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COLM is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

LULU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LULU is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LULU is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LULU is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LULU is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LULU is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LULU is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COLM vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current COLM Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLM and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

COLM vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

COLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
1.85%1.43%1.51%1.37%1.07%0.30%0.96%1.07%1.02%1.18%1.27%1.28%
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

COLM vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLM drawdown since its inception was -63.18%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLM and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

COLM vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) have volatilities of 11.16% and 10.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

COLM vs. LULU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Columbia Sportswear Company and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
778.45M
3.61B
(COLM) Total Revenue
(LULU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COLM vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Columbia Sportswear Company and Lululemon Athletica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
50.9%
60.4%
(COLM) Gross Margin
(LULU) Gross Margin
COLM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a gross profit of 396.06M and revenue of 778.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

LULU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

COLM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Columbia Sportswear Company reported an operating income of 46.51M and revenue of 778.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

LULU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.

COLM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a net income of 42.25M and revenue of 778.45M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

LULU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 748.40M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.