PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COLM vs. LULU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


COLMLULU
YTD Return7.66%-35.41%
1Y Return9.70%-23.58%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.81%-10.61%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.77%8.89%
10Y Return (Ann)8.66%22.26%
Sharpe Ratio0.47-0.66
Sortino Ratio0.81-0.72
Omega Ratio1.100.90
Calmar Ratio0.35-0.43
Martin Ratio1.86-0.68
Ulcer Index5.99%34.02%
Daily Std Dev23.47%35.37%
Max Drawdown-63.21%-92.24%
Current Drawdown-21.67%-35.41%

Fundamentals


COLMLULU
Market Cap$4.77B$39.40B
EPS$3.57$12.93
PE Ratio23.3524.82
PEG Ratio2.661.56
Total Revenue (TTM)$3.33B$7.79B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.67B$4.59B
EBITDA (TTM)$290.57M$2.28B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between COLM and LULU is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

COLM vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, COLM achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -35.41% return. Over the past 10 years, COLM has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of 8.66%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 22.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.19%
-2.37%
COLM
LULU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COLM vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COLM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COLM, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COLM, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COLM, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COLM, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COLM, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.86
LULU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LULU, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.90
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.68, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.68

COLM vs. LULU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLM Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLM and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.47
-0.66
COLM
LULU

Dividends

COLM vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

COLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
1.06%1.51%1.37%1.07%0.30%0.96%1.07%1.02%1.18%1.27%1.28%1.16%
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

COLM vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLM drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLM and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-21.67%
-35.41%
COLM
LULU

Volatility

COLM vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) is 9.11%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 11.14%. This indicates that COLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.11%
11.14%
COLM
LULU

Financials

COLM vs. LULU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Columbia Sportswear Company and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items