COLM vs. LULU
COLM (Columbia Sportswear Company) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — COLM in Apparel Manufacturing, LULU in Apparel Retail. Over the past 10 years, COLM returned 3.10%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for LULU. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COLM vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COLM achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -39.35% return. Over the past 10 years, COLM has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of 3.10%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 6.48% annualized return.
COLM
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- 19.28%
- 6M
- 19.09%
- 1Y
- 7.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.31%
- 5Y*
- -6.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
LULU
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -39.35%
- 6M
- -30.87%
- 1Y
- -62.37%
- 3Y*
- -29.87%
- 5Y*
- -17.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
COLM vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLM Columbia Sportswear Company | 19.28% | -33.05% | 7.08% | -7.79% | -8.79% | 12.63% | -12.50% | 20.33% | 18.23% | 24.85% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -39.35% | -45.66% | -25.21% | 59.59% | -18.16% | 12.48% | 50.23% | 90.50% | 54.74% | 20.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between COLM and LULU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2007 | 0.46 |
Fundamentals
COLM:
$3.12
LULU:
$14.61
COLM:
20.84
LULU:
8.62
COLM:
1.04
LULU:
1.36
COLM:
$3.40B
LULU:
$11.07B
COLM:
$1.72B
LULU:
$6.47B
COLM:
$253.11M
LULU:
$2.95B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COLM vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
COLM
LULU
COLM vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COLM | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.71 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | -0.97 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | -1.35 | +1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COLM | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | -1.31 | +1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | -0.42 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.16 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.25 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
COLM vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COLM drawdown since its inception was -63.18%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLM and LULU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COLM | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.18% | -92.26% | +29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.41% | -64.46% | +41.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.09% | -76.70% | +30.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.16% | -76.70% | +25.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.92% | -76.70% | +22.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.78% | -75.35% | +37.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.69% | -27.54% | +6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 46.25% | -33.22% |
Volatility
COLM vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) has a higher volatility of 11.45% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 9.72%. This indicates that COLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COLM | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.45% | 9.72% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.69% | 31.58% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.64% | 47.75% | -8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.95% | 42.04% | -10.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.77% | 40.54% | -7.77% |
Dividends
COLM vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
COLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLM Columbia Sportswear Company | 1.84% | 2.18% | 1.43% | 1.51% | 1.37% | 1.07% | 0.30% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.02% | 1.18% | 1.23% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
COLM vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Columbia Sportswear Company and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COLM vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
COLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a gross profit of 394.96M and revenue of 779.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.7%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.43B and revenue of 2.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.
COLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported an operating income of 41.99M and revenue of 779.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 444.69M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
COLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a net income of 34.31M and revenue of 779.01M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 306.84M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COLM and LULU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COLM has higher volatility (11.45%) compared to LULU (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLM dropped -63.18% vs LULU's -92.26%.
COLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COLM and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer