PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COLM vs. SKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COLM vs. SKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (SKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


COLM

1D
-0.25%
1M
7.79%
YTD
18.99%
6M
20.25%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
-3.38%
5Y*
-6.83%
10Y*
2.90%

SKX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COLM vs. SKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
18.99%-33.05%7.08%-7.79%-8.79%12.63%-12.50%20.33%18.23%24.85%
SKX
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
0.00%-6.11%7.86%48.61%-3.34%20.76%-16.79%88.69%-39.51%53.95%

Correlation

The correlation between COLM and SKX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1999

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between COLM and SKX has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COLM:

$3.42B

SKX:

$9.55B

EPS

COLM:

$3.12

SKX:

$4.40

PE Ratio

COLM:

20.79

SKX:

14.35

PS Ratio

COLM:

1.04

SKX:

1.01

PB Ratio

COLM:

2.16

SKX:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

COLM:

$3.40B

SKX:

$9.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COLM:

$1.72B

SKX:

$4.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

COLM:

$253.11M

SKX:

$1.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COLM vs. SKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLM
COLM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
COLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
COLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SKX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLM vs. SKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (SKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COLMSKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

COLM vs. SKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COLMSKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

Drawdowns

COLM vs. SKX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COLMSKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.03%

Volatility

COLM vs. SKX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COLMSKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.76%

Dividends

COLM vs. SKX - Dividend Comparison

COLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while SKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
1.85%2.18%1.43%1.51%1.37%1.07%0.30%0.96%1.07%1.02%1.18%1.23%
SKX
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

COLM vs. SKX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Columbia Sportswear Company and Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
779.01M
2.44B
(COLM) Total Revenue
(SKX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COLM vs. SKX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Columbia Sportswear Company and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

46.0%48.0%50.0%52.0%54.0%20222023202420252026
50.7%
53.3%
Portfolio components
COLM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a gross profit of 394.96M and revenue of 779.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.7%.

SKX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.30B and revenue of 2.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.

COLM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported an operating income of 41.99M and revenue of 779.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

SKX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported an operating income of 173.08M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

COLM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a net income of 34.31M and revenue of 779.01M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

SKX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported a net income of 170.50M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COLM and SKX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COLM and SKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer