COLM vs. VFC
COLM (Columbia Sportswear Company) and VFC (V.F. Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Apparel Manufacturing industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, COLM returned 2.12%/yr vs -10.23%/yr for VFC. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
COLM vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COLM achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, COLM has outperformed VFC with an annualized return of 2.12%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively lower -10.23% annualized return.
COLM
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- -6.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.38%
VFC
- 1D
- -4.28%
- 1M
- -12.15%
- 6M
- -26.13%
- YTD
- -19.96%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- -7.31%
- 5Y*
- -26.75%
- 10Y*
- -10.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.78M | $35.43M | $35.09M | |
| $167.52M | $128.15M | $135.42M |
COLM vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLM Columbia Sportswear Company | 8.89% | -33.05% | 7.08% | -7.79% | -8.79% | 12.63% | -12.50% | 20.33% | 18.23% | 24.85% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | -19.96% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between COLM and VFC is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1998 | 0.52 |
The correlation between COLM and VFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.64 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
COLM:
$3.04B
VFC:
$5.63B
COLM:
$3.87
VFC:
$0.89
COLM:
15.34
VFC:
16.01
COLM:
0.93
VFC:
0.44
COLM:
$3.41B
VFC:
$9.51B
COLM:
$1.77B
VFC:
$4.28B
COLM:
$303.80M
VFC:
$826.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COLM vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank
COLM
VFC
COLM vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COLM | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.13 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.75 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 1.85 | -0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COLM vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COLM drawdown since its inception was -63.18%, smaller than the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLM and VFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COLM | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.18% | -88.41% | +25.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.10% | -33.20% | +14.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.09% | -63.66% | +17.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.16% | -86.29% | +35.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.92% | -88.41% | +34.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.20% | -82.46% | +39.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.81% | -21.85% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.07% | 13.49% | -5.42% |
Volatility
COLM vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) is 9.51%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that COLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COLM | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 22.75% | -13.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.27% | 36.49% | -8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.03% | 51.32% | -11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.25% | 54.30% | -22.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 45.42% | -12.57% |
Dividends
COLM vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
COLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than VFC's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLM Columbia Sportswear Company | 2.02% | 2.18% | 1.43% | 1.51% | 1.37% | 1.07% | 0.30% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.02% | 1.18% | 1.23% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.51% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
COLM vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Columbia Sportswear Company and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COLM vs. VFC - Profitability Comparison
COLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a gross profit of 358.43M and revenue of 614.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.
VFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
COLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported an operating income of 35.05M and revenue of 614.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.
VFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
COLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a net income of 26.55M and revenue of 614.36M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
VFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of -106.89M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COLM and VFC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFC has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to COLM (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLM dropped -63.18% vs VFC's -88.41%.
VFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COLM and VFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer