PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVAL vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVAL vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVAL achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.


PVAL

1D
-0.16%
1M
3.63%
YTD
11.75%
6M
14.36%
1Y
32.58%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVAL vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
11.75%24.13%19.30%18.41%-2.61%11.44%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PVAL and YCS is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

-0.04

The correlation between PVAL and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVAL vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVAL
PVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVAL vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PVALYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.35

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

3.97

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.33

12.40

+4.93

PVAL vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVAL Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVAL and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PVALYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

1.92

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

1.12

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.33

+0.74

Drawdowns

PVAL vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVAL drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVAL and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVALYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-49.56%

+32.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-8.30%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-23.05%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

-27.32%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-19.93%

+16.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.66%

-0.77%

Volatility

PVAL vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) is 2.30%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that PVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVALYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

2.75%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

12.32%

-4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

17.27%

-6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

21.10%

-5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.24%

19.01%

-3.77%

PVAL vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVAL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

PVAL vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
0.98%1.00%1.34%1.33%0.59%0.47%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PVAL and YCS have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to PVAL (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVAL dropped -16.64% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.54% vs 15.96% for PVAL. On fees, PVAL is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.54% return vs 15.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PVAL is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

PVAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

PVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PVAL and 1.00% for YCS.

PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVAL and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer