PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVAL vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVAL vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVAL achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than ILCG's 9.97% return.


PVAL

1D
1.06%
1M
3.05%
YTD
13.07%
6M
13.55%
1Y
32.98%
3Y*
23.14%
5Y*
16.29%
10Y*

ILCG

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
9.97%
6M
11.01%
1Y
24.20%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
17.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVAL vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
13.07%24.13%19.30%18.41%-2.61%11.77%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
9.97%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%18.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PVAL and ILCG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.69

The correlation between PVAL and ILCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PVAL vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PVAL
ILCG

Financial Services

19.1%
5.5%

Healthcare

12.6%
5.2%

Industrials

12.1%
7.7%

Technology

11.9%
53.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.1%

Energy

8.4%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
1.4%

Communication Services

5.8%
13.5%

Utilities

5.0%
0.7%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.3%

Financial Services

PVAL
19.1%
ILCG
5.5%

Healthcare

PVAL
12.6%
ILCG
5.2%

Industrials

PVAL
12.1%
ILCG
7.7%

Technology

PVAL
11.9%
ILCG
53.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PVAL
10.2%
ILCG
10.1%

Energy

PVAL
8.4%
ILCG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

PVAL
8.3%
ILCG
1.4%

Communication Services

PVAL
5.8%
ILCG
13.5%

Utilities

PVAL
5.0%
ILCG
0.7%

Basic Materials

PVAL
4.4%
ILCG
1.0%

Real Estate

PVAL
2.1%
ILCG
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVAL vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVAL
PVAL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVAL vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PVALILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.24

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

1.46

+2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.87

5.04

+11.83

PVAL vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVAL and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PVAL vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVAL drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVAL and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVALILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-52.98%

+36.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-15.65%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-23.10%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

-35.38%

+18.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.92%

+4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-8.21%

+5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

4.51%

-2.61%

Volatility

PVAL vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) is 3.68%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that PVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVALILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

6.77%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

13.98%

-5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

17.16%

-6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

22.12%

-6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.25%

21.59%

-6.34%

PVAL vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVAL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PVAL vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than ILCG's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.42%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
0.97%1.00%1.34%1.33%0.59%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PVAL and ILCG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCG has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to PVAL (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVAL dropped -16.64% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 16.29% vs 13.61% for ILCG. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 16.29% return vs 13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.

PVAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.

PVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ILCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PVAL and 0.04% for ILCG.

PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVAL and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer