PVAL vs. ILCG
PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Putnam, while ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. PVAL is actively managed, while ILCG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PVAL returned 16.29%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for ILCG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PVAL charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.
Performance
PVAL vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PVAL achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than ILCG's 9.97% return.
PVAL
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 13.07%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 32.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- 16.29%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCG
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 24.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 17.85%
PVAL vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 13.07% | 24.13% | 19.30% | 18.41% | -2.61% | 11.77% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 9.97% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | -31.75% | 18.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVAL and ILCG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PVAL and ILCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PVAL vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PVAL
ILCG
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
PVAL
ILCG
Healthcare
PVAL
ILCG
Industrials
PVAL
ILCG
Technology
PVAL
ILCG
Consumer Cyclical
PVAL
ILCG
Energy
PVAL
ILCG
Consumer Defensive
PVAL
ILCG
Communication Services
PVAL
ILCG
Utilities
PVAL
ILCG
Basic Materials
PVAL
ILCG
Real Estate
PVAL
ILCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PVAL vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank
PVAL
ILCG
PVAL vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PVAL | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.24 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 1.46 | +2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.87 | 5.04 | +11.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PVAL vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVAL drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVAL and ILCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PVAL | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.64% | -52.98% | +36.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -15.65% | +8.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -23.10% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.64% | -35.38% | +18.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.92% | +4.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -8.21% | +5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 4.51% | -2.61% |
Volatility
PVAL vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) is 3.68%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that PVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PVAL | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 6.77% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 13.98% | -5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.12% | 17.16% | -6.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 22.12% | -6.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 21.59% | -6.34% |
PVAL vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PVAL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PVAL vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than ILCG's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 0.97% | 1.00% | 1.34% | 1.33% | 0.59% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PVAL and ILCG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILCG has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to PVAL (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVAL dropped -16.64% vs ILCG's -52.98%.
On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 16.29% vs 13.61% for ILCG. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 16.29% return vs 13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.
PVAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.
PVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ILCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PVAL and 0.04% for ILCG.
PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PVAL and ILCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer