PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUSH vs. RVNU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PUSH vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PUSH vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUSH achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 1.36% return.


PUSH

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RVNU

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.16%
1Y
2.94%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PUSH vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PUSH and RVNU have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

PUSH vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUSH
PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

RVNU
RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUSH vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUSHRVNUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.21

0.37

+1.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

0.53

+2.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.08

+0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

0.65

+3.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.49

1.55

+13.94

PUSH vs. RVNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the RVNU Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUSH and RVNU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUSHRVNUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

0.37

+1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.84

0.37

+2.48

Correlation

The correlation between PUSH and RVNU is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PUSH vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than RVNU's 3.53% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUSH
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF
3.31%3.45%1.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.53%3.46%3.06%2.79%2.81%2.18%2.43%2.75%2.76%2.49%2.72%3.01%

Drawdowns

PUSH vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUSH drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUSH and RVNU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PUSHRVNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-23.51%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.85%

-6.12%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-5.01%

+4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-4.99%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

2.57%

-2.33%

Volatility

PUSH vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) is 0.23%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that PUSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PUSHRVNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.23%

2.09%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

3.50%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64%

7.94%

-6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.33%

7.16%

-5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.33%

7.30%

-5.97%