PUSH vs. MMCA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA).

PUSH and MMCA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PUSH is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. MMCA is an actively managed fund by IndexIQ. It was launched on Dec 21, 2021.

Performance

PUSH vs. MMCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PUSH vs. MMCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	0.64%	4.16%	1.74%
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	-0.43%	5.74%	1.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUSH achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than MMCA's -0.43% return.

PUSH

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 1.46%
• 1Y: 3.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMCA

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -2.60%
• YTD: -0.43%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 3.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUSH vs. MMCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUSH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MMCA's 0.36% expense ratio.

MMCA

IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF

PUSH

PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF

Return for Risk

PUSH vs. MMCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 95
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 95

MMCA

MMCA Risk / Return Rank: 70
MMCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MMCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MMCA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
MMCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MMCA Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUSH vs. MMCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PUSH	MMCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.39	+0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	1.81	+1.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.30	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	1.67	+2.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	6.09	+9.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PUSH vs. MMCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the MMCA Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUSH and MMCA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PUSH	MMCA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	1.39	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.84	-0.03	+2.87

Correlation

The correlation between PUSH and MMCA is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PUSH vs. MMCA - Dividend Comparison

PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than MMCA's 3.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.60%	3.45%	1.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.67%	3.39%	3.66%	3.57%	2.90%	0.05%

Drawdowns

PUSH vs. MMCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUSH drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum MMCA drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUSH and MMCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUSH	MMCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-15.97%	+15.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.85%	-3.01%	+2.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-2.60%	+2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-7.26%	+7.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	0.82%	-0.58%

Volatility

PUSH vs. MMCA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) is 0.23%, while IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that PUSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUSH	MMCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.23%	1.23%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.08%	1.78%	-0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64%	3.43%	-1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.33%	3.64%	-2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.33%	3.64%	-2.31%