PUSH vs. IBMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PUSH (PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. PUSH is actively managed, while IBMM is passively managed. PUSH charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMM.

Performance

PUSH vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PUSH

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUSH vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	0.63%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

PUSH vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUSH vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PUSH	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.72	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.17	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PUSH	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.91	—	—

Drawdowns

PUSH vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUSH drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUSH and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUSH	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	0.00%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PUSH	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.98%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52%	0.00%	+1.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.30%	0.00%	+1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.30%	0.00%	+1.30%

PUSH vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUSH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PUSH vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.23%	3.45%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PUSH or IBMM?

On fees, PUSH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PUSH or IBMM?

PUSH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PUSH or IBMM?

PUSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between PUSH and IBMM?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PUSH and 0.18% for IBMM.