PULT vs. TFLO
PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) and TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PULT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Putnam, while TFLO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. PULT is actively managed, while TFLO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PULT returned 5.35%/yr vs 4.74%/yr for TFLO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PULT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TFLO.
Performance
PULT vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PULT achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 1.59% return.
PULT
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
PULT vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 1.23% | 5.08% | 5.93% | 5.46% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.59% | 4.22% | 5.34% | 4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PULT and TFLO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PULT vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank
PULT
TFLO
PULT vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PULT | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -40.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.12 | 13.94 | -10.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.92 | 201.22 | -186.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 102.05 | 823.26 | -721.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PULT | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.71 | 14.09 | -8.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 10.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 5.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 8.37 | 0.99 | +7.38 |
Drawdowns
PULT vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PULT drawdown since its inception was -0.34%, smaller than the maximum TFLO drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULT and TFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PULT | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -5.01% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.29% | -0.02% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.29% | -0.04% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | 0.00% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -0.10% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.00% | +0.04% |
Volatility
PULT vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.07%. This indicates that PULT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PULT | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 0.07% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 0.20% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75% | 0.28% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 0.35% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 0.46% | +0.17% |
PULT vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PULT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TFLO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PULT vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison
PULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than TFLO's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 4.65% | 4.59% | 5.38% | 4.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.90% | 4.16% | 5.21% | 4.88% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.86% | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PULT and TFLO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PULT has higher volatility (0.52%) compared to TFLO (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PULT dropped -0.34% vs TFLO's -5.01%.
On 3-year performance, PULT leads with 5.35% vs 4.74% for TFLO. On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PULT has performed better with a 5.35% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PULT.
PULT has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 3.90% for TFLO.
PULT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TFLO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PULT and 0.15% for TFLO.
TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.09 vs 5.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PULT and TFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer