PULT vs. GSUI
PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) and GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PULT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Putnam, while GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. PULT is actively managed, while GSUI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. PULT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GSUI.
Performance
PULT vs. GSUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PULT achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than GSUI's -39.93% return.
PULT
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -12.82%
- YTD
- -39.93%
- 6M
- -46.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PULT vs. GSUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 1.23% | 0.60% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -39.93% | -34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PULT and GSUI is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PULT vs. GSUI — Risk / Return Rank
PULT
GSUI
PULT vs. GSUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PULT | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 102.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PULT | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 8.37 | -0.78 | +9.15 |
Drawdowns
PULT vs. GSUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PULT drawdown since its inception was -0.34%, smaller than the maximum GSUI drawdown of -60.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULT and GSUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PULT | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -60.73% | +60.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -60.73% | +60.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -43.81% | +43.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | — | — |
Volatility
PULT vs. GSUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PULT | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75% | 107.79% | -107.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 107.79% | -107.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 107.79% | -107.16% |
PULT vs. GSUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PULT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUI's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PULT vs. GSUI - Dividend Comparison
PULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, while GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 4.65% | 4.59% | 5.38% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PULT and GSUI have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PULT.
PULT has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.
PULT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GSUI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PULT and 0.00% for GSUI.
Find the right allocation for PULT and GSUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer