PULT vs. GBIL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PULT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Putnam, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. PULT is actively managed, while GBIL is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PULT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.

Performance

PULT vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PULT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.71%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 4.58%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PULT vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	1.23%	5.08%	5.93%	5.47%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	1.83%	4.12%	5.24%	4.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PULT and GBIL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023	0.25

Return for Risk

PULT vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PULT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PULT vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PULT	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	17.01	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	133.10	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	63.62	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	192.18	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2,029.86	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PULT	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.04%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PULT	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.23%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	0.58%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	0.47%	—

PULT vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PULT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PULT vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

PULT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.71%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	3.89%	4.59%	5.38%	4.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PULT and GBIL in my portfolio?

PULT and GBIL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PULT or GBIL?

On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PULT or GBIL?

GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PULT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PULT or GBIL?

PULT has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 3.71% for GBIL.

What is the main difference between PULT and GBIL?

PULT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GBIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PULT and 0.12% for GBIL.