PULT vs. DLLL
PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PULT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Putnam, while DLLL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). PULT is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. Over the past year, PULT returned 4.26% vs 850.63% for DLLL. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. PULT charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
PULT vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PULT achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 757.76% return.
PULT
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- -6.45%
- 1M
- 245.92%
- YTD
- 757.76%
- 6M
- 648.38%
- 1Y
- 850.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PULT vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 1.23% | 4.56% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 757.76% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PULT and DLLL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | -0.12 |
PULT vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PULT
DLLL
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
PULT
DLLL
-
Real Estate
PULT
DLLL
-
Industrials
PULT
DLLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
PULT
DLLL
-
Communication Services
PULT
DLLL
-
Technology
PULT
DLLL
Healthcare
PULT
DLLL
-
Utilities
PULT
DLLL
-
Energy
PULT
DLLL
-
Basic Materials
PULT
DLLL
-
Consumer Defensive
PULT
-
DLLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PULT vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
PULT
DLLL
PULT vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PULT | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.12 | 1.60 | +1.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.92 | 15.02 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 102.05 | 31.34 | +70.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PULT | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.71 | 6.65 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 8.37 | 3.16 | +5.21 |
Drawdowns
PULT vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PULT drawdown since its inception was -0.34%, smaller than the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULT and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PULT | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -68.58% | +68.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.29% | -57.19% | +56.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -18.86% | +18.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -25.91% | +25.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 27.36% | -27.32% |
Volatility
PULT vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) is 0.52%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 69.39%. This indicates that PULT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PULT | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 69.39% | -68.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 102.08% | -101.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75% | 129.28% | -128.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 130.55% | -129.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 130.55% | -129.92% |
PULT vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PULT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PULT vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
PULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 4.65% | 4.59% | 5.38% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PULT and DLLL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to PULT (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PULT dropped -0.34% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 850.63% vs 4.26% for PULT. On fees, PULT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PULT has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 850.63% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PULT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
PULT has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.
PULT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while DLLL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PULT and 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs 5.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PULT and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer