PULT vs. CUSD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) and CUSD (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PULT returned 5.34%/yr vs 4.69%/yr for CUSD. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. PULT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for CUSD.

Performance

PULT vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PULT achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than CUSD's 1.42% return.

PULT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 4.18%
• 3Y*: 5.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CUSD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 3.36%
• 3Y*: 4.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PULT vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	1.19%	5.08%	5.93%	5.46%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	1.42%	5.02%	4.57%	5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PULT and CUSD is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023	-0.00

Return for Risk

PULT vs. CUSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PULT

PULT Risk / Return Rank: 98
PULT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PULT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PULT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PULT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PULT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CUSD

CUSD Risk / Return Rank: 15
CUSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CUSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CUSD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CUSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CUSD Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PULT vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PULT	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.59	0.25	+5.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.01	0.48	+9.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.04	1.07	+1.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.86	0.62	+12.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	89.82	1.63	+88.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PULT vs. CUSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PULT Sharpe Ratio is 5.59, which is higher than the CUSD Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PULT and CUSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PULT	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.59	0.25	+5.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	8.33	0.65	+7.68

Drawdowns

PULT vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PULT drawdown since its inception was -0.34%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULT and CUSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PULT	CUSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.34%	-5.42%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.33%	-5.42%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.33%	-5.42%	+5.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-2.75%	+2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.46%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	2.06%	-2.01%

Volatility

PULT vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) is 0.52%, while CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that PULT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PULT	CUSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.52%	4.32%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.62%	10.95%	-10.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75%	13.67%	-12.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.63%	7.02%	-6.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.63%	7.02%	-6.39%

PULT vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PULT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

PULT vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison

PULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, less than CUSD's 13.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	13.85%	14.05%	7.10%	3.62%	1.14%
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	4.65%	4.59%	5.38%	4.88%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PULT and CUSD in my portfolio?

PULT and CUSD have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PULT or CUSD?

CUSD has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to PULT (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PULT dropped -0.34% vs CUSD's -5.42%.

Which ETF is better, PULT or CUSD?

On 3-year performance, PULT leads with 5.34% vs 4.69% for CUSD. On fees, PULT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PULT has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PULT or CUSD?

Over the 3-year period, PULT has performed better with a 5.34% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PULT or CUSD?

PULT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for CUSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PULT or CUSD?

CUSD has the higher dividend yield at 13.85%, compared with 4.65% for PULT.

What is the main difference between PULT and CUSD?

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and CrossingBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PULT and 0.81% for CUSD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PULT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.59 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.