PULT vs. AMLP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PULT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Putnam, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. PULT is actively managed, while AMLP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. PULT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.

Performance

PULT vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PULT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMLP

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: 2.99%
• 6M: 15.34%
• YTD: 18.74%
• 1Y: 19.21%
• 3Y*: 19.54%
• 5Y*: 18.25%
• 10Y*: 6.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PULT vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	1.23%	5.08%	5.93%	5.47%
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	18.74%	5.78%	22.76%	16.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PULT and AMLP is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between PULT and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PULT vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PULT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMLP

AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 54
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 54
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PULT vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PULT	AMLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.16	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.04	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PULT	AMLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-77.19%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.27%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.10%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-17.32%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PULT	AMLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.50%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.69%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	27.65%	—

PULT vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PULT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

PULT vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

PULT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	7.49%	8.36%	7.70%	7.86%	7.70%	8.55%	12.31%	9.12%	9.29%	7.97%	8.09%	9.84%
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	3.89%	4.59%	5.38%	4.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PULT and AMLP in my portfolio?

PULT and AMLP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PULT or AMLP?

On fees, PULT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PULT or AMLP?

PULT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PULT or AMLP?

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.49%, compared with 3.89% for PULT.

What is the main difference between PULT and AMLP?

PULT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while AMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PULT and 0.90% for AMLP.