PULS vs. SPAXX
PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) and SPAXX (Fidelity Government Money Market Fund) are both funds - PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM, while SPAXX is a Money Market fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PULS returned 4.25%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for SPAXX. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PULS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for SPAXX.
Performance
PULS vs. SPAXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PULS achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than SPAXX's 1.64% return.
PULS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.34%
SPAXX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $150.87M | $124.45M | $127.30M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PULS vs. SPAXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 2.43% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 6.26% | 1.52% | 0.14% |
SPAXX Fidelity Government Money Market Fund | 1.64% | 3.96% | 1.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PULS and SPAXX is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021 | 0.06 |
The correlation between PULS and SPAXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (5 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PULS vs. SPAXX — Risk / Return Rank
PULS
SPAXX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PULS vs. SPAXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and Fidelity Government Money Market Fund (SPAXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PULS | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 49.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 280.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PULS vs. SPAXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PULS drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, which is greater than SPAXX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULS and SPAXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PULS | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | 0.00% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.34% | 0.00% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.79% | 0.00% | -0.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.00% | +0.02% |
Volatility
PULS vs. SPAXX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) has a higher volatility of 0.10% compared to Fidelity Government Money Market Fund (SPAXX) at 0.00%. This indicates that PULS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PULS | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.00% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.32% | 0.59% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42% | 0.96% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.70% | 0.70% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 0.69% | +0.63% |
PULS vs. SPAXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PULS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAXX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
PULS vs. SPAXX - Dividend Comparison
PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than SPAXX's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.47% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% |
SPAXX Fidelity Government Money Market Fund | 3.20% | 3.88% | 1.53% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PULS and SPAXX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PULS has higher volatility (0.10%) compared to SPAXX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PULS dropped -5.85% vs SPAXX's 0.00%.
PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.68 vs 3.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PULS and SPAXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer