PULS vs. SHV
PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) and SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM, while SHV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. PULS is actively managed, while SHV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PULS returned 4.12%/yr vs 3.31%/yr for SHV. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
PULS vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PULS achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 1.42% return.
PULS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
SHV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
PULS vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.73% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 6.26% | 1.52% | 0.48% | 1.47% | 2.97% | 1.71% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.42% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between PULS and SHV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2018 | 0.30 |
The correlation between PULS and SHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PULS vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
PULS
SHV
PULS vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PULS | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -116.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.59 | 53.77 | -46.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 52.47 | 431.38 | -378.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 318.56 | 2,419.80 | -2,101.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PULS | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41 | 19.49 | -8.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.92 | 11.56 | -5.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.51 | 4.50 | -1.99 |
Drawdowns
PULS vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PULS drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULS and SHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PULS | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -0.45% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.09% | -0.01% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.34% | -0.03% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.79% | -0.40% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -0.03% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.00% | +0.01% |
Volatility
PULS vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) has a higher volatility of 0.11% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that PULS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PULS | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.11% | 0.05% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.30% | 0.12% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41% | 0.20% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.70% | 0.29% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 0.28% | +1.05% |
PULS vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PULS and SHV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PULS vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than SHV's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PULS and SHV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PULS has higher volatility (0.11%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PULS dropped -5.85% vs SHV's -0.45%.
On 5-year performance, PULS leads with 4.12% vs 3.31% for SHV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PULS has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PULS and SHV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
PULS has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.83% for SHV.
PULS is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SHV is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 11.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PULS and SHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer