PULS vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. PULS is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PULS returned 4.14%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for FDVV. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PULS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

PULS vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PULS achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 9.30% return.

PULS

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.10%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 4.14%
• 10Y*: —

FDVV

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 6M: 9.44%
• 1Y: 23.92%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PULS vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.88%	4.97%	6.12%	6.26%	1.52%	0.48%	1.47%	2.97%	1.71%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	9.30%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PULS and FDVV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018	0.10

The correlation between PULS and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PULS vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PULS

PULS Risk / Return Rank: 99
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 73
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PULS vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PULS	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	11.41	2.24	+9.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	32.91	3.14	+29.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.59	1.41	+6.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	52.47	2.44	+50.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	317.38	10.11	+307.27

PULS vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PULS Sharpe Ratio is 11.41, which is higher than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PULS and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PULS vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PULS drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULS and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PULS	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.85%	-40.25%	+34.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.09%	-9.30%	+9.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.34%	-15.90%	+15.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.79%	-20.18%	+19.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.29%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.09%	-3.80%	+3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	2.24%	-2.23%

Volatility

PULS vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) is 0.11%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that PULS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PULS	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	3.16%	-3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.30%	8.16%	-7.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41%	10.12%	-9.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.70%	14.76%	-14.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.33%	16.98%	-15.65%

PULS vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PULS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

PULS vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than FDVV's 2.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.70%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.57%	4.78%	5.62%	5.48%	2.30%	1.19%	1.85%	2.69%	1.87%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PULS and FDVV in my portfolio?

PULS and FDVV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PULS or FDVV?

FDVV has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PULS dropped -5.85% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which ETF is better, PULS or FDVV?

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.53% vs 4.14% for PULS. On fees, PULS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PULS has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PULS or FDVV?

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PULS or FDVV?

PULS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PULS or FDVV?

PULS has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 2.70% for FDVV.

What is the main difference between PULS and FDVV?

PULS is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PULS and 0.29% for FDVV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.41 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.