PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUI vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUI vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUI achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PUI has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 8.38%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.


PUI

1D
0.28%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
6.59%
6M
2.93%
1Y
13.83%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
8.38%

MTUM

1D
-1.10%
1M
11.94%
YTD
30.30%
6M
29.99%
1Y
40.55%
3Y*
34.34%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUI vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUI
Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF
6.59%15.25%23.91%-4.47%-2.17%15.02%-5.05%20.95%6.12%11.85%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
30.30%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PUI and MTUM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.40

PUI vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PUI
MTUM

Utilities

77.6%
1.6%

Energy

10.5%
3.5%

Industrials

9.8%
15.6%

Communication Services

2.1%
7.4%

Financial Services

0.1%
10.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Healthcare

-

6.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

44.4%

Utilities

PUI
77.6%
MTUM
1.6%

Energy

PUI
10.5%
MTUM
3.5%

Industrials

PUI
9.8%
MTUM
15.6%

Communication Services

PUI
2.1%
MTUM
7.4%

Financial Services

PUI
0.1%
MTUM
10.4%

Basic Materials

PUI

-

MTUM
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PUI

-

MTUM
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

PUI

-

MTUM
3.3%

Healthcare

PUI

-

MTUM
6.9%

Real Estate

PUI

-

MTUM
1.8%

Technology

PUI

-

MTUM
44.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUI vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUI
PUI Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUI vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUIMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.38

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

3.53

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

14.10

-11.19

PUI vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUI Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUI and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUIMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

2.14

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.73

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.82

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Drawdowns

PUI vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUI drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUI and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUIMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-34.08%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-11.54%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.28%

-20.99%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-32.28%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-34.08%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-1.10%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-6.21%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

2.89%

+1.87%

Volatility

PUI vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) is 5.29%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that PUI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUIMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

7.67%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

16.51%

-5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

19.08%

-4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

20.60%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

21.03%

-1.96%

PUI vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUI vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

PUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
PUI
Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF
2.10%2.22%2.06%2.36%2.16%2.03%2.42%2.02%1.87%2.98%3.35%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUI and MTUM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to PUI (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUI dropped -43.20% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.19% vs 8.38% for PUI. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PUI has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PUI.

PUI has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

PUI tracks DWA Utilities Technical Leaders Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PUI and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUI and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer