PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUDZX vs. BLPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUDZX vs. BLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUDZX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than BLPAX's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PUDZX has underperformed BLPAX with an annualized return of 6.84%, while BLPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


PUDZX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
12.74%
6M
12.56%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
6.84%

BLPAX

1D
-0.47%
1M
2.21%
YTD
7.09%
6M
7.64%
1Y
18.42%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUDZX vs. BLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
12.74%13.40%8.61%3.26%-2.76%18.49%4.84%16.29%-9.20%6.22%
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
7.09%16.64%11.30%13.87%-13.60%13.87%13.16%19.53%-4.59%16.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PUDZX and BLPAX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between PUDZX and BLPAX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUDZX vs. BLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUDZX
PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BLPAX
BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUDZX vs. BLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUDZXBLPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.42

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.00

2.60

+3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.02

11.60

+10.41

PUDZX vs. BLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUDZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the BLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUDZX and BLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUDZXBLPAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.22

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.72

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.85

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.91

-0.37

Drawdowns

PUDZX vs. BLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUDZX drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum BLPAX drawdown of -23.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUDZX and BLPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUDZXBLPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.53%

-23.21%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.56%

-7.26%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.20%

-10.62%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-20.65%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.53%

-23.21%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-0.47%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-2.92%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.62%

-0.65%

Volatility

PUDZX vs. BLPAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) is 2.05%, while American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that PUDZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUDZXBLPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

2.70%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.08%

6.83%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.49%

8.52%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.53%

10.41%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.70%

10.83%

-1.13%

PUDZX vs. BLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUDZX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BLPAX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUDZX vs. BLPAX - Dividend Comparison

PUDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than BLPAX's 5.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
5.44%5.83%3.59%2.30%6.01%4.97%2.56%3.83%4.69%3.48%3.66%3.69%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
7.75%8.93%6.67%3.66%9.10%13.00%4.94%3.40%2.14%2.10%1.39%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUDZX and BLPAX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLPAX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to PUDZX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUDZX dropped -21.53% vs BLPAX's -23.21%.

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUDZX and BLPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer