PTY vs. VLTCX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX).
PTY is managed by FPA. It was launched on Dec 24, 2002. VLTCX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010.
Performance
PTY vs. VLTCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PTY vs. VLTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTY PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund | -3.88% | -0.51% | 19.87% | 22.56% | -18.71% | 0.40% | 3.24% | 35.36% | 2.49% | 26.63% |
VLTCX Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares | -1.46% | 7.27% | -1.47% | 11.05% | -25.77% | -1.16% | 13.68% | 23.19% | -6.85% | 12.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTY achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly lower than VLTCX's -1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PTY has outperformed VLTCX with an annualized return of 9.09%, while VLTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.
PTY
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -11.85%
- 1Y
- -7.27%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
VLTCX
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PTY vs. VLTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTY has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VLTCX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PTY vs. VLTCX — Risk / Return Rank
PTY
VLTCX
PTY vs. VLTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTY | VLTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | 0.41 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | 0.61 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.08 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.85 | -1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 1.99 | -3.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTY | VLTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 | 0.41 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | -0.12 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.24 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between PTY and VLTCX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PTY vs. VLTCX - Dividend Comparison
PTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.82%, more than VLTCX's 5.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTY PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund | 11.82% | 11.05% | 9.92% | 10.77% | 13.12% | 9.16% | 8.74% | 8.37% | 10.63% | 9.48% | 12.09% | 11.92% |
VLTCX Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares | 5.16% | 5.48% | 5.58% | 4.65% | 4.41% | 3.03% | 3.15% | 3.82% | 4.56% | 4.01% | 4.37% | 4.71% |
Drawdowns
PTY vs. VLTCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTY drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, which is greater than VLTCX's maximum drawdown of -34.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTY and VLTCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTY | VLTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.86% | -34.56% | -26.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.44% | -5.29% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.38% | -34.56% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.55% | -34.56% | -11.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.76% | -16.08% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -7.97% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.47% | 2.26% | +4.21% |
Volatility
PTY vs. VLTCX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX) at 3.47%. This indicates that PTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PTY | VLTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 3.47% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 5.29% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.35% | 8.94% | +7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 11.87% | +5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 10.59% | +10.62% |