PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLTCX vs. VUBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLTCX vs. VUBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLTCX achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than VUBFX's 1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, VLTCX has underperformed VUBFX with an annualized return of 2.41%, while VUBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.61% annualized return.


VLTCX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.27%
YTD
1.12%
6M
0.45%
1Y
8.33%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
-1.55%
10Y*
2.41%

VUBFX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
2.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLTCX vs. VUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.12%7.27%-1.47%11.05%-25.77%-1.16%13.68%23.19%-6.85%12.40%
VUBFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares
1.37%5.04%5.99%5.43%-0.53%0.03%1.95%3.34%1.94%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between VLTCX and VUBFX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLTCX vs. VUBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLTCX
VLTCX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VLTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
VLTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VUBFX
VUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLTCX vs. VUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLTCXVUBFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

5.71

-4.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

12.83

-11.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

4.52

-3.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

15.05

-13.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.70

84.72

-81.02

VLTCX vs. VUBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLTCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the VUBFX Sharpe Ratio of 5.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLTCX and VUBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLTCXVUBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

5.71

-4.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

3.45

-3.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

3.15

-2.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

3.11

-2.66

Drawdowns

VLTCX vs. VUBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLTCX drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, which is greater than VUBFX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLTCX and VUBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLTCXVUBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.56%

-1.86%

-32.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-0.30%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-0.30%

-12.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.56%

-1.86%

-32.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.56%

-1.86%

-32.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.88%

0.00%

-13.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-0.17%

-7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

0.05%

+2.10%

Volatility

VLTCX vs. VUBFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX) at 0.17%. This indicates that VLTCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLTCXVUBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

0.17%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

0.54%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.69%

0.78%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.87%

0.99%

+10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.61%

0.83%

+9.78%

VLTCX vs. VUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLTCX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VUBFX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLTCX vs. VUBFX - Dividend Comparison

VLTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than VUBFX's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.51%5.48%5.58%4.65%4.41%3.03%3.15%3.82%4.56%4.01%4.37%4.71%
VUBFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares
4.42%4.62%5.42%4.06%1.28%0.43%1.52%2.58%2.13%1.43%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLTCX and VUBFX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLTCX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to VUBFX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLTCX dropped -34.56% vs VUBFX's -1.86%.

VUBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.71 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLTCX and VUBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer