PTY vs. QRSVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PTY (PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund) and QRSVX (FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class) are both mutual funds - PTY is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by FPA, while QRSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value. Over the past 5 years, PTY returned -0.40%/yr vs 11.64%/yr for QRSVX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTY charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for QRSVX.

Performance

PTY vs. QRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTY achieves a -3.77% return, which is significantly lower than QRSVX's 25.02% return.

PTY

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -2.48%
• YTD: -3.77%
• 6M: -5.18%
• 1Y: -4.95%
• 3Y*: 7.52%
• 5Y*: -0.40%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

QRSVX

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: 7.55%
• YTD: 25.02%
• 6M: 23.22%
• 1Y: 37.84%
• 3Y*: 21.60%
• 5Y*: 11.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTY vs. QRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PTY PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund	-3.77%	-0.51%	19.87%	22.56%	-18.71%	0.40%	1.71%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	25.02%	13.37%	10.72%	16.04%	-9.14%	23.16%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PTY and QRSVX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020	0.34

The correlation between PTY and QRSVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTY vs. QRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTY

PTY Risk / Return Rank: 1
PTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
PTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

QRSVX

QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 83
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTY vs. QRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTY	QRSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	2.64	-3.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.55	3.90	-4.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.47	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	5.05	-5.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.65	17.89	-18.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTY vs. QRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the QRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTY and QRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTY	QRSVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46	2.64	-3.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.67	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.83	-0.37

Drawdowns

PTY vs. QRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTY drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, which is greater than QRSVX's maximum drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTY and QRSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTY	QRSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.86%	-20.59%	-40.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.44%	-7.93%	-7.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	-18.91%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.38%	-20.59%	-20.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.67%	0.00%	-12.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.61%	-4.90%	-3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.60%	2.23%	+5.37%

Volatility

PTY vs. QRSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) is 2.82%, while FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that PTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTY	QRSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	4.53%	-1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.52%	10.45%	-2.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.82%	15.19%	-4.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.40%	17.48%	-0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	17.49%	+3.71%

PTY vs. QRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTY has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than QRSVX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTY vs. QRSVX - Dividend Comparison

PTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.04%, more than QRSVX's 3.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PTY PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund	12.04%	11.05%	9.92%	10.77%	13.12%	9.16%	8.74%	8.37%	10.63%	9.48%	12.09%	11.92%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	3.56%	4.45%	4.86%	2.56%	2.07%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTY and QRSVX in my portfolio?

PTY and QRSVX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTY or QRSVX?

QRSVX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to PTY (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTY dropped -60.86% vs QRSVX's -20.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.