PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTSGX vs. TGVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTSGX vs. TGVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX) and Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund (TGVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTSGX achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly lower than TGVFX's 9.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PTSGX has underperformed TGVFX with an annualized return of 16.76%, while TGVFX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.92% annualized return.


PTSGX

1D
1.83%
1M
8.26%
YTD
7.73%
6M
7.00%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
16.76%

TGVFX

1D
1.17%
1M
7.16%
YTD
9.18%
6M
8.33%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
14.36%
10Y*
19.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTSGX vs. TGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTSGX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund
7.73%15.27%23.79%51.60%-50.56%3.76%68.92%67.10%5.80%34.42%
TGVFX
Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund
9.18%17.61%32.50%42.73%-28.62%22.55%33.12%72.37%-4.05%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PTSGX and TGVFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.90

The correlation between PTSGX and TGVFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTSGX vs. TGVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTSGX
PTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TGVFX
TGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTSGX vs. TGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX) and Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund (TGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTSGXTGVFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

1.90

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

2.57

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.89

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.71

6.44

-4.72

PTSGX vs. TGVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the TGVFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTSGX and TGVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTSGXTGVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.90

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.60

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.85

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.50

-0.11

Drawdowns

PTSGX vs. TGVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTSGX drawdown since its inception was -60.33%, smaller than the maximum TGVFX drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTSGX and TGVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTSGXTGVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.33%

-69.41%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.16%

-16.01%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.56%

-23.50%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.07%

-40.77%

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.07%

-40.77%

-19.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

0.00%

-1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.83%

-22.72%

+6.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.39%

4.71%

+4.68%

Volatility

PTSGX vs. TGVFX - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund (TGVFX) at 3.52%. This indicates that PTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTSGXTGVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

3.52%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

11.93%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

16.04%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.88%

24.00%

+6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.97%

23.54%

+5.43%

PTSGX vs. TGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTSGX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than TGVFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTSGX vs. TGVFX - Dividend Comparison

PTSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than TGVFX's 17.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTSGX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund
0.61%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.67%10.05%39.46%34.95%24.32%16.89%9.33%
TGVFX
Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund
17.62%19.24%6.16%2.66%2.40%17.21%10.29%34.44%11.32%9.98%3.67%10.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTSGX and TGVFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTSGX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to TGVFX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTSGX dropped -60.33% vs TGVFX's -69.41%.

TGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTSGX and TGVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer